posted Nov 9, 2011 4:02 PM by Erik Smitt
6 Sept 2011
There is no bigger issue
to be addressed than redistricting. This
redistricting battle is at the core of one man, one vote and representative
democracy in Sacramento; we are not talking about Africa or Alabama ... we are
in Sacramento. There was a back room
meeting that skirted the Brown Act (Open Meetings). This was the typical "Smokey" back
room deal, obscured from public
view. Don't think that a no smoking ordnance and a voting rights act, changed
anything ... do not be fooled, the objective was still safe seats. The Council Six (Cohn, Sheedy, McCarty,
Pannell, R Fong, D Fong) voted their own personal interests ... to get
re-elected to their current seats and future office ambitions. This is the fundamental reason for the fight
over the medical center, rail yard, etc. (follow the money). The Council Six were simply insuring their
futures by gerrymandering.
To
execute their plan, they disenfranchised the residents of Oak Park. The proud, emotional and massive response by
Oak Park residents before the council will fade over time; they do not have the
political muscle (money), so treating them as second class citizens will not
require the Council Six to pay a price.
The
Latino community was advantageously carved up to insure minority status across several
districts. Thus, creating an obstacle
for any Latino candidate to mount a challenge to an incumbent. This is illegal ... little matter to the
Council Six.
Unprincipled,
self serving, politicians ... out for their own interests rather than serving
the public interest of the citizens of
Sacramento. To quote one presenter ...
if it quacks like a duck ... if it walks like a duck ... it is a duck. As Mayor Johnson noted, no one is
fooled.
I
thank Angelique Ashby for voting NO
on this map. |
|